funded by  
All suggested pathways ought to be regarded "putative" because only mulitple analysis of a patient's karyotpe over a long period of time can provide a good basis for a "real" pathway. Here, the evolution steps have to be reconstructed from data of many patients at different stages fo tumour progression.
Not always is the first rearrangement to become cytogenetically visible also the start event of a tumour progression. It could be a later event which will then start its typical evolution pathway. Also such cases are meant to become detectable.
There upon the evolution tree window is opened, but the evolution tree
is not yet calculated. You may edit the parameters
first. To show the evolution tree, select "Show - Tree" from the menu (the
"Show - Data" menu is not yet functional).
The evolution tree is calculated and shown in the window:
The window is divided into two sections: on the left panel, the evolution tree proper is shown as a tree view. On the right, statistical information is shown on a selected node (point in evolution).
Between the two sections, there is a splitter which can be moved with the mouse (click on the blue bar with the left button, and move the mouse while keeping the button pressed).
Nodes in the evolution tree start with a boxed "+" or "-". A "+" means that the node can be expanded, thus making more information (later steps in evolution) visible. Clicking on "-", later steps of evolution are hidden.
A point of an evolution pathway (node) is selected by clicking on it. The right panel is updated after each selection.
Technical information on the EvolutionTree control is available from the Data Mining documentation.
The next evolutionary step is shown below its parent node and indented once. Also here, alternative next steps may exist and are shown below each other. In the above example, the tumour progressed with either "+8", or "i(17)(q10)" or "-Y" or "+der(22)t(9;22)(q34;q11)" after the initial "t(9;22)(q34;q11)"; i.e. there are four alternatives.
In the above example, the last node is selected. For clarity, its text is shown on the right panel as first item.
The "Full Path" shows all the steps and their series towards the selected node. Here, after intitial "t(9;22)(q34;q11)" followed "+der(22)t(9;22)(q34;q11)", and finally "i(17)(q10)". That is, the respective karyotypes were initially "...,t(9;22)(q34;q11)", " "...,t(9;22)(q34;q11),+der(22)t(9;22)(q34;q11)" and finally "...,t(9;22)(q34;q11),i(17)(q10),+der(22)t(9;22)(q34;q11)" (here, no information is given on the sex chromosomes; hence the points ("...") may stand for "46,XX" and "47,XX" or "46,XY" and "47,XY", resp.).
"Support" means the number of cases (karyotypes) which contains the above combination of rearrangements; those karyotypes may contain further rearrangements which may not be shown. In this example, only two karyotypes were found with "t(9;22)(q34;q11),i(17)(q10),+der(22)t(9;22)(q34;q11)", which corresponds to 0.76% of all karyotypes.
"Parent Node Support" means the number of cases (karyotypes) which contains
the combination of rearrangements of the previous evolution step (here:
"t(9;22)(q34;q11),+der(22)t(9;22)(q34;q11)"); those karyotypes may contain
further rearrangements (e.g. the subsequent evolution steps or random aberrations)
which may not be shown. Here, there are 12 karyotypes at the parent node.
The 2 karyotypes found with the selected node correspond to 16.67%
of all karyotypes with the parent aberrations.
"Expected Support at Independence" shows how often the selected combination of events was expected to be found when the last event and its parent were statistically independent from each, with the pre-condition of the events of the grand-partent node present. The dependence factor gives a measure for the reliabilty of the dependence; it is the chi-square value for the above statistics.
"Alternative Pathways" may lead to the same final combination of rearrangements. Here, the final point could be reached alternatively by "t(9;22)(q34;q11)\i(17)(q10)\+der(22)t(9;22)(q34;q11)"; the mining algorithm could not decide which pathway was more important, with the current set of mining parameters.
In any case, do not believe that the pathways shown must be correct - they still could be bare nonsense. Always look at them with your knowledge of tumours and tumour progression.
Alternatively, the parameters can be accessed from the CyDAS
main window using the "Edit - Mining
Parameters" menu. Changing the parameters from the main window will
influence all mining windows opened later.
The edit form shows the parameters and their present values:
E.g. if the start event was found in 200 cases, at least 20 cases among them must have the second event. If that combination of start event and second event was found in 30 cases, at least 3 cases among them must have the third event, and so on.
The default value of 1 means that both events must have always occured together. A value greater than 1 will prevent binning. Values less than 1 do not require full mutual dependence of the events; such values may be useful when calculating evolution trees from cytoband data.
High values lead to highly branched evolution trees, while small values give raise to a straight line of evolution.
High values may require lots of time for getting to a result, the time may increase exponentially.